New Rubbers for my new blade

General

Ji-Soo Woo
Ji-Soo Woo Asked 15 years ago

Hi Alois

I know it is not wise to get too fixated on equipment.  I know it's best to stick to something of a good quality and just work on your technique.  However, every time I try to get out, the allure of the 'perfect combination' keeps pulling me back in (a la Al Pacino)!

My latest slip back into equipment junkie-ness was due to my wife buying me a new blade for my birthday.  It is the butterfly Amultart ZL.  It hasn't arrived yet but the blade looks a beauty on the Net (and it cost more than all my other blades put together!).

Hardly something I have a right to complain about, right?!  But it has put me in a spin (pardon the pun) trying to think of rubbers worthy of it.  Especially after I read somewhere that it doesn't suit Chinese rubbers (and all my rubbers are Chinese).  Since it is such a fast blade, I will probably need a rubber that has decent spin and control.  I looked at your shop and was intrigued by Yasaka Pryde (used by none other than William Henzell) for my forehand. 

I don't suppose you (or any other reader) have an opinion on how that combination might work?  Ideally I would like high arc spinny loops on my forehand and more low skimming fast loop kills on my backhand.  Any recommendations on the backhand rubber suitable for the Amultart?

Sorry to be joining the chorus asking you about equipment!  I know you've been using your old blade forever and would rather people spent the time and effort hitting the local table tennis centre and pounding that ball.  What can I say?  The flesh is willing but the mind is weak....


Alois Rosario
Alois Rosario Answered 15 years ago

Hi Ji-Soo,

Don't be apologetic about the equipment fixation... it happens to the best of us.

I really haven't got much for you here, not having used the Amultart ZL.

Let's see if we have some experienced readers that can shed some light on that combination.

I am not sure whether you can say that a blade doesn't suit a particluar type of rubber.

I know William likes the throw of the Pryde rubber.  I am sure you have read his review of Yasaka Pryde.

Come on readers help out Ji-Soo here especially Amultart users.


Thoughts on this question


Mike Ivanov

Mike Ivanov Posted 15 years ago

I'm not an Amultar user but I think that if you need good control on your forehand you can try something like Donic Coppa JO rubber on forehand and for backhand you can try Tibhar nimbus which I heard was  excellent for control but contains a high degree of speed which may suit your blade and forehand rubber.

Piao Piao Unknown

Piao Piao Unknown Posted 15 years ago

Mike this is gonna sound really weird but what you just said about those two rubbers is exactly what i use have Tibhar Nimbus Donic JO coppa now that is Coincidental 

Ji-Soo Woo

Ji-Soo Woo Posted 15 years ago

The Butterfly Amultart arrived today...and I went ahead and ordered Pryde and Omega III from pingskills....:)

It's a (very) fast combination....hope I can tame it!


Ji-Soo Woo

Ji-Soo Woo Posted 15 years ago

I just got word from my wife the rubbers have arrived.  Thanks Alois and Jeff!  Can't wait to take them for a spin!!! ;)

Lionel Unknown

Lionel Unknown Posted 15 years ago

Hi Ji Soo,

What you have ordered is it Xiom Omega III Asian or European?  How does it feel after one day of trial?

 Hi PiaoPiao, Or any other reader who knows this....

Since you are a user of Tibhar Nimbus, would like to ask how's the THROW ANGLE of the ball projecting from the rubber during top spin looping?  I am thinking to purchase Tibhar Nimbus Sound to be glued to Tibhar Samsonov Alpha blade.  Just wish the throw angle is reasonably high enough so that I could consistently loop heavy back spin ball over the net clean and still not too long off the table edge.  Thanks....


Ji-Soo Woo

Ji-Soo Woo Posted 15 years ago

REVIEW - FIRST IMPRESSIONSCombination: Butterfly Amultart ZL Carbon blade + 2.0mm Yasaka Pryde (FH) + max Asian Omega III (BH)I am in love...First of all, when gluing the racquet together, everything about the rubbers spoke of high quality...and I loved the translucent topsheet on the Omega III!  This was the first time for me not using Chinese rubbers and the lack of tackiness was very noticeable to the touch.  Even bouncing the ball off the racquet in my living room I had a sense of the power purring within.  The combination felt surprisingly light, but I didn’t weigh it so cannot give specific grams.Last night I had a good 5 hours of continuous play after work (my wife wasn’t impressed!).  Here are my initial impressions…First of all, having played with T-8/faster 3 combination before, which is pretty fast already, a part of me wondered whether this combination would end up being disappointingly same-old-same-old.  No need to fear!  From the very first rally, I was blown away!!  The first couple of hours I was hitting balls all over the place (except on the table).  Only occasionally I would hit a great shot out of the blue and impress everyone.  For the last 2-3 hours I started playing in patches.  There would be 7-8 points where I could do no wrong, and then another 7-8 points where I would miss wildly again.  Now for more specifics (aka the ‘good stuff’)I didn’t really know what ‘speed glue sound’ was until now…and I love it!  Every time you hit the sweet spot, the bat just goes ‘pop’!  The Pryde seemed louder but maybe that was because it was on the FH.  That noise just makes you want to go and whack something!Blocking with the Pryde was a bit of a problem for me.  It tended to pop up a bit, and I’d often block long and with less pace than I expected.  Blocking with the Omega III was absolute perfection.  By the end of the night I was blocking with mouth watering pace.  The ball was skimming over the net and hitting corners as if it had a homing device.  It made me feel like changing my style and becoming a blocker!  In fairness to Pryde, I think technically my backhand block is much sounder than my forehand block so for a really fair comparison I should have tried both rubbers on the same side.  Both rubbers excelled in generating pace from slow/small strokes.  It was funny because in a rally people tend to match the pace of their strokes with yours, and I was hitting so gently (and yet generating so much pace) that when the opponent matched the same stroke speed they couldn’t make it back to the net! Heh heh!  One thing that stuck in my mind was the backhand punch down the line with Omega III.  Amazingly, this is not a shot in my repertoire (though I know the technique of how to do it)!  However, last night, I was hitting backhand punches beautifully.  They were landing in the corner and were so fast that the opponent had not flinched before the ball hit the back wall!  I didn’t even know I could do that!Forehand smashes with Pryde were absolutely magnificent.  My opponent last night is a good blocker of smashes and can usually return a dozen before I put one away (or miss!).  Last night, I had smashes sizzling past (accompanied by the beautiful speed glue pop) and he would just laugh and shake his head.I also tried flipping with both rubbers and they were both fantastic.  I was able to really generate a lot of pace off a small stroke and my flips rarely came back.  I also was surprised at the consistency I got chopping with my Omega III (and I’m not even a good chopper!).  Pushing was okay with both rubbers (but occasionally I would just miss the table by about a table length!).  I had trouble doing drop shots.When I was on a purple patch, I basically was driving everything and finishing off with a smash.  Driving with both rubbers is great.  However, I had a lot of trouble looping (usually going long).  In fact, I had a hard time generating spin at all.  My opponent noted that my serves were less spinny compared with my Chinese rubbers.  Also, even when I finally got a loop on the table, he said it had only a fraction of the spin I normally generated with the same stroke.I guess my main fear using this combination is that I become one of those ‘hard hitters’…hitting everything flat or with minimal topspin, and just relying on pace.  Speed is great, but I want to be an all-round player.  Of course, I am sure these rubbers are fully CAPABLE of generating a ton of spin (I notice William Henzell does not too badly!), but I think I have to adapt my technique (accounting for the extra pace and the lack of tackiness).  Another thing I noticed was that the combination really punished bad strokes.  Sometimes in a rally you find yourself surprised, out of position, late to a shot, etc…  then you sort of just hit a general shot in the general vicinity of the opponent’s half and just try to get it into play.  With my old rubbers this was okay.  With this rubber if you don’t commit yourself to a stroke, the ball usually ends up in the bleachers.  Any hesitation or indecision and the combination lets you know!  This is not a bad thing necessarily because it forces you to play in a more committed fashion.  Also, because I didn’t have to work so hard to generate power, I found it easier to keep myself relaxed and loose.In order for this combination to be my salvation, I will have to learn how to generate spin with it.  However, this was just day 1, and I promised myself to persevere for at least one full pennant season no matter the results.  After 4 months I should have a better idea how it suits my game.  As my opponent commented last night, however, the

Lionel Unknown

Lionel Unknown Posted 15 years ago

Hi Ji-Soo,

How's the throw angle of both Yasaka Pryde and Xiom Omega III?  I know this is not an easy question considering that you could not yet generate enough spin during looping.   My question basically means how easy it is to loop heavy back spin ball without going into the net, and yet successfully drop on opponent's table without going too long? 


Ji-Soo Woo

Ji-Soo Woo Posted 15 years ago

Hi Lionel

I didn't face any chops, only pushes, so nothing with spectacular backspin, but with that qualification I had a much easier time attacking backspin with this racquet (on both sides) than I did previously with my faster 3s (which have quite low throws).

Even though I couldn't do heavy loops, even driving the ball I was (by the end of the night) fairly consistently able to turn backspin into topspin.  In fact, the ability to attack pushes is probably the most exciting improvement with my new combination.

I've been hearing a lot of opinions about my combination.  Some people say they've seen many table tennis players unable to generate spin with the Pryde.  Others talk about my set up being very weak against the short game.  Anyway, I've only had one hit with it so still too early to say.


Ji-Soo Woo

Ji-Soo Woo Posted 15 years ago

This Tenergy 5 sounds enticing if Pryde ends up not working out.  Has anyone tried both?  What are the salient differences?

 


Carlo Unknown

Carlo Unknown Posted 15 years ago

I had exclusive time with Tenergy via my clubmate's bats. Here is what I think. For years I've been playing with Sriver glued and unglued and I think Tenergy is a suitable change from glued Sriver. So my guess is that if you're using Mark V for a long time already, go for Pryde. I see similar characteristics like they are both medium soft rubbers, verstaile etc.

What I don't get is why can't manufacturers just make a factory tuned Sriver or Mark V so we can still play a modified classic rubber and we don't need to adjust to Tensor rubbers. I adjusted my counter looping stroke in Tenergy because it's going too high.

 


Lionel Unknown

Lionel Unknown Posted 15 years ago

Diaz,

Would like to know when you mean the throw angle is very high for Tenergy 05, do you mean the throw angle during top spin exchanges only, or even top spin against back spin ball?  So, I can imagine that the stroke adjustment you meant, for example, if previously you need to hit the ball at a position slightly higher than the middle of the ball to put the ball over the net onto the other's table, perhaps now you have to hit the ball the near the top of the ball, so that can keep the ball over the net and still onto the table without going too long.  Is that what you mean?  And is this style of stroke needed to top spin a back spin ball to opponent? 


Carlo Unknown

Carlo Unknown Posted 15 years ago

I think Tenergy's throw is medium. I adjusted my loop stroke to really brush the top of the ball. Tenergy is a topspin monster. It can loop topspin and backspin very well at a really fast speed and very heavy spin. To use this topspin machine, you need to be at a very high level of play, trains at least regualarly and knows how to brush the ball. Look at Timo and you'll know what I mean.

Nobody has the same strokes. Everyone's loop is unique in it's own way. You can adjust your stroke by experimenting. Try different contact points, when to hit the ball etc. Because no one but yourself can tell what you need to adjust.

Hope this helps. Also my name is Carlo. Don't call me by my family name as you may be calling my whole family (If you're Japanese, then it's okay. I understand you call guys by last name.


Lionel Unknown

Lionel Unknown Posted 15 years ago

Carlo,

Thanks, I can know what you mean.  And the fact that how Timo executes his top spin (always brushing near the top of the ball during top spin exchanges) is the testimony of the throw angle.  I have seen other players like Guo Yue (using Tenergy 05) playing against Park Mi Young's chopping, she has to lift the ball, instead of playing flat.  Thus, I think it is quite related to the blade used as well.  What blade do you use with Tenergy 05?  Wish you know any of this information pertaining to Tibhar Nimbus Sound, does it have medium or high throw angle same as Tenergy?   


Carlo Unknown

Carlo Unknown Posted 15 years ago

I use the Timo Boll Spirit and Primorac Off- on Tenergy.

I use Timo Boll Spirit because 1. I need a looping blade that\\\'s not to hard or soft 2. Timo Boll is my idol.

I used Primorac Off- as my first starting blade.

I know that Primorac Off- to Timo Boll Sprit with Tenergy is a huge step up but I know it\\\'s a worth while investment since I\\\'ll get used to the blade and rubber anyways because of everyday training for 3 hours. I only have 2 blades and I don\\\'t plan on buying more.

 My rule of the thumb when buying is that go to table tennis forums and ask. That\\\'s right. Pingskills is a small comunity of supporters and lovers of table tennis but table tennis forums have much more knowledge. (Don\\\'t get the Equipment Junkie Virus while you\\\'re at it.)


Lionel Unknown

Lionel Unknown Posted 15 years ago

Carlo,

Thanks, and I studied Butterflyonline video pertaining to Tenergy 05, and it seems the looping stroke to topspin a backspin ball is practially no different from topspin a topspin ball according to the illustration of the video for Tenergy 05.  Is this a testimony of how excellent the medium throw rubber is during looping?

During your own 3-hour training everyday, do you find yourself looping a back spin ball and looping a top spin ball your racquet angle at contact with the ball, amount of brushing/hitting, and swing stroke basically no different?


Carlo Unknown

Carlo Unknown Posted 15 years ago

Hi Leonel, obviously you have to change your swing against backspin but it's otherwise the same. Like I said before, Tenergy is a topspin machine and you can do anything with it that includes topspin. I have rather interesting feedback about Tenergy 05 though. I did a lob and smash rally today because I was bored. I really had a hard time with my Tenergy 05. It's almost impossible to land the ball on the table with precision unlike my previous setup, SRIVER. I had to adjust my stroke again. You have hit the ball at the top with very fast hand speed(not power). My counterhitting stroke is still okay though.

My theory is that the lob's heavy topspin affected my smash against lob stroke and since Tenergy is a topspin machine, it was made to counter heavy topsin with counterlooping it. Comparing it to my counterhitting stroke, I guess this theory is OKAY. My theory is to swing faster with more power and effort to cancel out the spin and kill the ball.

Just a friendly note, Brian Pace did that video for Butterfly and he now owns his own Company, Dynamic Table Tennis (www.dynamictabletennis.com). He uses a discountinued blade(Kreanga Aeros), a Glass Fiber blade.


Carlo Unknown

Carlo Unknown Posted 15 years ago

To answer your throw angle question:

Low Throw Angle: Against Topspin = Easy /Against Backspin = Adjust Stroke

Medium Throw Angle: Equally committed

High Throw Angle: Against Topsin = Close more/ Against Backspin = Easy

This is one of the reasons why I always choose medium throw rubbers.


Mike Ivanov

Mike Ivanov Posted 15 years ago

If I'm not mistaken the two rubbers are rather similar in angle but you don't need hours of dedication to loop with nimbus sound.

Ji-Soo Woo

Ji-Soo Woo Posted 15 years ago

I had another solid session with my new racquet today.  Whereas the first sesson my playing partner noted I had less spin (but more speed) than with my previous racquet, this time I seemed to be generating more spin as well on the loops and drives.

I'm also slowly tweeking my service action and seem to be generating better spin on serves as well.

Before my pennant season commences, main things I will have to work on with my new combination is just consistency.  I also still have trouble keeping pushes down.  Signs are looking good however and I'm making faster progress than I expected.


Ji-Soo Woo

Ji-Soo Woo Posted 15 years ago

After another session, I am more convinced than ever this combination will be the one to take me to division 1.  I'm getting much better spin and speed.  Even my serves are at least as spinny as they used to be with the tacky Chinese rubbers.  The only weakness is that you can't play safe and half-heartedly, just content to keep the ball in play.  But that weakness is a great learning tool because it is forcing me to commit myself to every stroke - even when my confidence is down.  Also, this racquet REALLy punishes you if you get lazy with footwork, and also forces you to play lower to the ground.

What more can one ask for?  A racquet that lets you hit balls with ridiculous speed and spin, and also helps reinforce good technique and habits!


Lionel Unknown

Lionel Unknown Posted 15 years ago

Hi Mike,

Referring to your notes as I extracted below:

"Mike I. commented...

on the 11-Jul-2009 12:24:40 AM

If I'm not mistaken the two rubbers are rather similar in angle but you don't need hours of dedication to loop with nimbus sound."
Query >>  the "two rubbers" you meant here are Tibhar Nimbus Sound and Tenergy 05?  And secondly, "don't need hours of dedication to loop with Nimbus Sound", does it mean Nimbus Sound is almost easy to be adapted fast during looping back spin ball and top spin ball, comparing to "another rubber" ?(which I guess is Tenergy 05)
Thanks....

Mike Ivanov

Mike Ivanov Posted 15 years ago

Yes Nimbus sound and Tenergy is I think very similar but Nimbus sound

gives you more room for mistake and doesn\'t punish you for not doing

everything right.


Ji-Soo Woo

Ji-Soo Woo Posted 15 years ago

I am already thinking of my next combination...

Yasaka Pryde 30 sounds like a lot of fun - more spin than Yasaka Pryde and more control.  Alois, will Pingskills be selling Pryde 30?


Lionel Unknown

Lionel Unknown Posted 15 years ago

I have been playing with Pro-Top Carbon King Jpen blade with Stiga Boost TC unglued, loving to do brushing loop (more friction, less knocking), the throw angle is reasonable, and I need to commit to certain fast brushing speed and thin brush (without much knocking) to topspin a heavy backspin ball to clear the net.  Throw angle is considered medium in my existing equipment set up.  One evening, I tried my friend's Primorac Carbon and Tenergy 05 holding it with penhold style.  He served backspin to me, I topspin the ball using my usual habitual thin brushing spin stroke.  Woooww...amazing to say, the first time in my table tennis play I feel the T05 rubber firmly gripped the ball at contact, hence giving the ball tremendous amount of spin which I could not feel with other equipment.  The first bounce of the ball clearing the net with sufficient margin (signifying higher throw), but with slower flight speed comparing to my Boost TC.   At first I thought, with such higher throw arc in the air and noticeably slower flight speed, where would the ball land on opponent's table?  Amazed!!!  The super high spin makes the ball dipped down under aerodynamic theory to opponent's table, with still around 18cm to spare before missing the table edge.  After the ball touched the table, I was very joyous to see the second bounce so low and accelerated forward due to the high spin, and a noticeable curved of path (perhaps I had put in some sidespin topspin which I was unaware of). When I tried to serve with T05 on Primorac Carbon with reasonably heavy backspin (just like what I normally served with my Boost TC), my friend pushed the ball back to me, and due to such heavy backspin serving to him, his push coming back with Newton's 3rd Law in place --> that means ... heavy back spin to me!  It was so heavy that I top spin with T05 but failed to clear the net! I only used his racquet combination (Primorac Carbon + T05) for about 6 minutes before the security guard asked us to vacate the table due to time up.  But that 6 minutes last week was giving me so much hope alive that I have been looking for a high throw combination, and most likely it is about there, T05 might be the answer.... However, would like to say, in terms of flight speed, definitely Boost TC on Pro-Top Carbon King Jpen is much faster!  Although spin rate noticeably slower than Primorac Carbon-T05 combo.  In terms of noticeable responses:  eg.  feel in hand during ball contact, distinctive awareness of a high spin being imparted, and noticeable flight path change and sudden dip in low angle second bounce with high spin, T05 provides all the clear response.  It is due to this clear response that when I touched the ball at more brushing topspin, my mind told me "It is sure to clear the net!", and the ball cleared the net!  When I top spin with Boost TC, I could not feel this conviction and assurance of clearing the net.

Alois Rosario

Alois Rosario from PingSkills Posted 15 years ago

Ji-Soo we will not be stocking Pryde 30. I think just adding to the too many options pile...

ishkebai patel

ishkebai patel Posted 14 years ago

hi

can the butterfly amultart be used with haifu whale 3 and calibra lt 

is it a good combination for a medium length attacker who sometimes likes to chop

thanks


Stephen Walters

Stephen Walters Posted 12 years ago

ji soo, regarding the pryde 30, i use it, and i love it. it is nice and fast, but also very spinny, if spin is your game. i use the timo boll spirit with pryde 30, and i absolutely love it for all aspects.


Become a free member to post a comment about this question.