Strategy
My question is about the tactical value of the forehand smash shot between players of equal ability. I've watched a lot of matches in which the defending player manages to return the forehand smash with, what appears to be, relative ease.
You often see exchanges between attacking and defensive players that can go on for many shots – the attacking players often leaping into the air to gain some possible additional advantage. However a good defensive player can anticipate the smash and make a return from virtually any angle – so you have to wonder, purely from a tactical point of view, if the smash is worth it?
Of course from a spectator point of view these exchanges are a great spectacle.
Thanks for a great site and all your helpful videos.
Hi Paul,
Speed is one of the factors that can win you points. The other thing to look at are spin and placement. I think a combination of these things can win you points. If you always play with speed then your opponent can become used to it.
What should you do when the score is 9–9 or deuce? One point can be the difference between victory and frustration. In this video, we break down how to win close table tennis matches with a smart, pressure-tested strategy.
🏓 In this video, you'll learn:
🎯 Takeaway: Winning close matches isn’t about playing harder—it’s about playing smarter.
💬 Question for you:
What’s your go-to serve or tactic at 9–9? Or… what mistake do you often make in tight matches? Let us know in the comments!
Become a free member to post a comment about this question.
Charlie Chung Posted 12 years ago
One thing I do when smashing against a good lobber is to hit one smash with 50% power, using the same form as the full smash. They usually have to dig to get it (because it doesn't go as far), and then I go back to full power. This usually disrupts their rhythm...
Good suggestion Charlie!